Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs UMLGX
GFACX vs UMLGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs UMLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$71.94
Change+$0.24 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst
Price$7.93
Change+$0.04 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets713.88M
GFACX vs UMLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. UMLGX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and UMLGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. UMLGX (714M). GFACX (0.00) and UMLGX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than UMLGX: GFACX (24 years) vs UMLGX (28 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than UMLGX (0.94). UMLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMLGX: GFACX (250) vs UMLGX (2000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.45 vs. UMLGX (-6.38). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 38.85 vs. UMLGX (-42.83).
| GFACX | UMLGX | GFACX / UMLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.80 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.94 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.829 | -9.164 | -140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 714M | 45,938% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.45 | -6.38 | -242% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.55 | 10.45 | 493% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.85 | -42.83 | -91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.89 | -57.91 | -117% |