Ad is loading...
GFACX vs UMLGX
GFACX vs UMLGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs UMLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$56.58
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.04B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst
Price$7.57
Change+$0.02 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets637.94M
GFACX vs UMLGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. UMLGX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and UMLGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. UMLGX (638M). GFACX (0.00) and UMLGX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than UMLGX: GFACX (24 years) vs UMLGX (28 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than UMLGX (0.94). UMLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMLGX: GFACX (250) vs UMLGX (2000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.76 vs. UMLGX (-17.67). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 27.92 vs. UMLGX (-38.42).
| GFACX | UMLGX | GFACX / UMLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.80 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.94 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.261 | -13.517 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 638M | 40,909% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.76 | -17.67 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.62 | -22.72 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.92 | -38.42 | -73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.91 | -61.02 | -54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...