Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs UMLGX
GFACX vs UMLGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs UMLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$72.97
Change-$0.51 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst
Price$7.93
Change-$0.11 (-1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets659.75M
GFACX vs UMLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. UMLGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and UMLGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. UMLGX (660M). GFACX (0.00) and UMLGX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than UMLGX: GFACX (25 years) vs UMLGX (28 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than UMLGX (0.91). UMLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMLGX: GFACX (250) vs UMLGX (2000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.07 vs. UMLGX (-16.53). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 24.08 vs. UMLGX (-51.50).
| GFACX | UMLGX | GFACX / UMLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.80 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.91 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.445 | -9.164 | -158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330B | 660M | 50,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.07 | -16.53 | -31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.86 | 8.78 | 625% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.08 | -51.50 | -47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.66 | -56.57 | -123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement