Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs UMLGX
GFACX vs UMLGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs UMLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.76
Change-$0.81 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.97B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst
Price$8.99
Change-$0.13 (-1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets722.73M
GFACX vs UMLGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. UMLGX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and UMLGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. UMLGX (723M). GFACX (0.00) and UMLGX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than UMLGX: GFACX (24 years) vs UMLGX (28 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than UMLGX (0.94). UMLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMLGX: GFACX (250) vs UMLGX (2000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.17 vs. UMLGX (-7.22). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 39.11 vs. UMLGX (-34.06).
| GFACX | UMLGX | GFACX / UMLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.80 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.94 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.705 | 4.467 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 310B | 723M | 42,877% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.17 | -7.22 | -72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.73 | 18.29 | 255% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.11 | -34.06 | -115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.69 | -53.11 | -105% |