Ad is loading...
GFACX vs UMLGX
GFACX vs UMLGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs UMLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$62.05
Change+$0.45 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst
Price$8.38
Change+$0.03 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets696.16M
GFACX vs UMLGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. UMLGX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and UMLGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. UMLGX (696M). GFACX (0.00) and UMLGX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than UMLGX: GFACX (24 years) vs UMLGX (28 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than UMLGX (0.94). UMLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMLGX: GFACX (250) vs UMLGX (2000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.60 vs. UMLGX (-10.98). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.66 vs. UMLGX (-36.16).
| GFACX | UMLGX | GFACX / UMLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.80 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.94 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.682 | -4.353 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284B | 696M | 40,805% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.60 | -10.98 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.28 | 5.83 | 485% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.66 | -36.16 | -96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.25 | -56.83 | -80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...