Ad is loading...
GFACX vs UMLGX
GFACX vs UMLGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs UMLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$65.66
Change-$1.58 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.33B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst
Price$8.72
Change-$0.19 (-2.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets790.53M
GFACX vs UMLGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. UMLGX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and UMLGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. UMLGX (791M). GFACX (0.00) and UMLGX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than UMLGX: GFACX (24 years) vs UMLGX (27 years). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. UMLGX (26.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMLGX: GFACX (250) vs UMLGX (2000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.15 vs. UMLGX (-7.53). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.83 vs. UMLGX (-37.04).
| GFACX | UMLGX | GFACX / UMLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.980 | -0.115 | -2,602% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304B | 791M | 38,432% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.15 | -7.53 | -135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.69 | -11.20 | -158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.83 | -37.04 | -89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.63 | -54.01 | -103% |