Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs UMLGX
GFACX vs UMLGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs UMLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$70.62
Change+$0.69 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst
Price$7.81
Change+$0.10 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets723.91M
GFACX vs UMLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. UMLGX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and UMLGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. UMLGX (724M). GFACX (0.00) and UMLGX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than UMLGX: GFACX (24 years) vs UMLGX (28 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than UMLGX (0.94). UMLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMLGX: GFACX (250) vs UMLGX (2000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.68 vs. UMLGX (-14.74). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 39.40 vs. UMLGX (-42.19).
| GFACX | UMLGX | GFACX / UMLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.80 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.94 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.759 | -10.538 | -102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 724M | 44,613% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.68 | -14.74 | -59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.72 | 11.57 | 456% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.40 | -42.19 | -93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.66 | -57.39 | -118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement