Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs UMLGX
GFACX vs UMLGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs UMLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$73.45
Change+$0.17 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst
Price$7.64
Change-$0.05 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets661.34M
GFACX vs UMLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. UMLGX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and UMLGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. UMLGX (661M). GFACX (0.00) and UMLGX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than UMLGX: GFACX (25 years) vs UMLGX (28 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than UMLGX (0.94). UMLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMLGX: GFACX (250) vs UMLGX (2000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.14 vs. UMLGX (-11.06). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.72 vs. UMLGX (-49.10).
| GFACX | UMLGX | GFACX / UMLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.80 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.94 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.198 | -12.486 | -122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 661M | 50,227% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.14 | -11.06 | -146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.18 | 5.09 | 1,045% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.72 | -49.10 | -67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.85 | -56.24 | -142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers