Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs UMLGX
GFACX vs UMLGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs UMLGX
GFACX vs UMLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. UMLGX commentary
Jul 29, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and UMLGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. UMLGX (502M). GFACX (0.00) and UMLGX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than UMLGX: GFACX (25 years) vs UMLGX (29 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than UMLGX (0.91). UMLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMLGX: GFACX (250) vs UMLGX (2000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.85 vs. UMLGX (-5.67). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 2.16 vs. UMLGX (-47.40).
| GFACX | UMLGX | GFACX / UMLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.80 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.91 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.848 | 5.949 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 502M | 71,116% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.85 | -5.67 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.00 | -14.51 | -179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.16 | -47.40 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.70 | -55.21 | -132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement