Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs UMLGX
GFACX vs UMLGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs UMLGX
GFACX vs UMLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. UMLGX commentary
Jul 08, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and UMLGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. UMLGX (519M). GFACX (0.00) and UMLGX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than UMLGX: GFACX (25 years) vs UMLGX (29 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than UMLGX (0.91). UMLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMLGX: GFACX (250) vs UMLGX (2000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.16 vs. UMLGX (-2.18). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 8.63 vs. UMLGX (-45.70).
| GFACX | UMLGX | GFACX / UMLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.80 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.91 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.618 | 8.215 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 519M | 69,557% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.16 | -2.18 | -191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.24 | -9.69 | -394% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.63 | -45.70 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.20 | -52.10 | -164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement