Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs UMLGX
GFACX vs UMLGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs UMLGX
GFACX vs UMLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. UMLGX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and UMLGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. UMLGX (497M). GFACX (0.00) and UMLGX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than UMLGX: GFACX (26 years) vs UMLGX (29 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than UMLGX (0.92). UMLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMLGX: GFACX (250) vs UMLGX (2000). UMLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.26 vs. GFACX (-2.86). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 2.72 vs. UMLGX (-45.18).
| GFACX | UMLGX | GFACX / UMLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.76 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.92 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.816 | 10.340 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 497M | 71,026% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.86 | 0.26 | -1,113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.52 | -7.70 | -448% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.72 | -45.18 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.52 | -53.19 | -150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement