Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs VRGWX
GFACX vs VRGWX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs VRGWX
GFACX vs VRGWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. VRGWX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and VRGWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. VRGWX (54.3B). VRGWX pays higher dividends than GFACX: VRGWX (0.47) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than VRGWX: GFACX (26 years) vs VRGWX (16 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than VRGWX (0.05). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. VRGWX (10.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than VRGWX: GFACX (250) vs VRGWX (5000000). VRGWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.79 vs. GFACX (-2.39). VRGWX return over 5 years is better than : 68.78 vs. GFACX (3.85).
| GFACX | VRGWX | GFACX / VRGWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.05 | 2,700% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.05 | 2,700% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.529 | 2.542 | 335% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 54.3B | 650% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.39 | 5.79 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.46 | 74.69 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.85 | 68.78 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.33 | 376.73 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement