Ad is loading...
GFACX vs WBGSX
GFACX vs WBGSX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs WBGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$70.27
Change-$0.64 (-0.90%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
William Blair Growth N
Price$11.90
Change-$0.09 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
GFACX vs WBGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. WBGSX commentary
Nov 15, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and WBGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. WBGSX (264M). GFACX (0.00) and WBGSX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than WBGSX: GFACX (24 years) vs WBGSX (79 years). WBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GFACX (31.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBGSX: GFACX (250) vs WBGSX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.12 vs. WBGSX (16.63). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 48.44 vs. WBGSX (18.71).
| GFACX | WBGSX | GFACX / WBGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 79 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.927 | 23.608 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 264M | 115,909% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.12 | 16.63 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.45 | -15.38 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.44 | 18.71 | 259% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.85 | -23.29 | -253% |