Ad is loading...
GFACX vs WBGSX
GFACX vs WBGSX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs WBGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.41
Change+$0.90 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
William Blair Growth N
Price$7.51
Change+$0.15 (+2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.39M
GFACX vs WBGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. WBGSX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and WBGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. WBGSX (198M). GFACX (0.00) and WBGSX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than WBGSX: GFACX (24 years) vs WBGSX (79 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than WBGSX (1.26). WBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBGSX: GFACX (250) vs WBGSX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.10 vs. WBGSX (-31.15). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.34 vs. WBGSX (-14.72).
| GFACX | WBGSX | GFACX / WBGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.20 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.26 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 79 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.959 | -16.268 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 198M | 131,818% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.10 | -31.15 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.19 | -28.05 | -8% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.34 | -14.72 | -254% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.37 | -48.06 | -74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...