Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs WBGSX
GFACX vs WBGSX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs WBGSX
GFACX vs WBGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. WBGSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and WBGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. WBGSX (226M). GFACX (0.00) and WBGSX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than WBGSX: GFACX (25 years) vs WBGSX (80 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than WBGSX (1.25). WBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBGSX: GFACX (250) vs WBGSX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.73 vs. WBGSX (-21.23). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 6.34 vs. WBGSX (-43.84).
| GFACX | WBGSX | GFACX / WBGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.20 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.25 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 80 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.746 | 7.463 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 226M | 157,965% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.73 | -21.23 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.09 | -29.41 | -106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.34 | -43.84 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.97 | -43.08 | -183% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement