Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs WPSGX
GFACX vs WPSGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs WPSGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$73.45
Change+$0.17 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
AB Concentrated Growth Advisor
Price$56.26
Change-$0.62 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets725.27M
GFACX vs WPSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. WPSGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and WPSGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. WPSGX (725M). WPSGX pays higher dividends than GFACX: WPSGX (0.13) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than WPSGX: GFACX (25 years) vs WPSGX (32 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than WPSGX (0.75). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSGX (11.00). WPSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: WPSGX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.14 vs. WPSGX (-2.53). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.72 vs. WPSGX (21.58).
| GFACX | WPSGX | GFACX / WPSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.75 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.75 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.198 | 6.432 | 236% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 725M | 45,793% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.13 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.14 | -2.53 | -637% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.18 | 23.95 | 222% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.72 | 21.58 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.85 | 102.28 | 78% |