Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs WPSGX
GFACX vs WPSGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs WPSGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.90
Change-$0.11 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets343.07B
AB Concentrated Growth Advisor
Price$57.71
Change-$0.20 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets736.58M
GFACX vs WPSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. WPSGX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and WPSGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. WPSGX (737M). WPSGX pays higher dividends than GFACX: WPSGX (0.13) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than WPSGX: GFACX (25 years) vs WPSGX (32 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than WPSGX (0.75). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSGX (11.00). WPSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: WPSGX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.58 vs. WPSGX (-2.82). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.58 vs. WPSGX (20.37).
| GFACX | WPSGX | GFACX / WPSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.75 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.75 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.040 | 9.554 | 199% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 737M | 46,540% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.13 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.58 | -2.82 | -411% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.06 | 39.58 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.58 | 20.37 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.18 | 106.58 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement