Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs WPSGX
GFACX vs WPSGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs WPSGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.76
Change-$0.81 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.97B
AB Concentrated Growth Advisor
Price$54.21
Change-$0.94 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets737.35M
GFACX vs WPSGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. WPSGX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and WPSGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. WPSGX (737M). WPSGX pays higher dividends than GFACX: WPSGX (0.14) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than WPSGX: GFACX (24 years) vs WPSGX (31 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than WPSGX (0.75). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSGX (11.00). WPSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: WPSGX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.17 vs. WPSGX (-1.79). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 39.11 vs. WPSGX (31.53).
| GFACX | WPSGX | GFACX / WPSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.75 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.75 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.705 | 4.332 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 310B | 737M | 42,062% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.14 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.17 | -1.79 | -289% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.73 | 26.90 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.11 | 31.53 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.69 | 92.11 | 60% |