Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs WPSGX
GFACX vs WPSGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs WPSGX
GFACX vs WPSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. WPSGX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and WPSGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. WPSGX (467M). WPSGX pays higher dividends than GFACX: WPSGX (0.04) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than WPSGX: GFACX (25 years) vs WPSGX (32 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than WPSGX (0.75). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPSGX (18.00). WPSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: WPSGX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.62 vs. WPSGX (-12.76). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 8.46 vs. WPSGX (-18.42).
| GFACX | WPSGX | GFACX / WPSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.75 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.75 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.019 | -6.011 | -150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 467M | 77,302% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.04 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.62 | -12.76 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.32 | -0.72 | -5,149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.46 | -18.42 | -46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.18 | 85.86 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers