Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs HCMGX
GFAFX vs HCMGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs HCMGX
GFAFX vs HCMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. HCMGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and HCMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. HCMGX (2.22B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than HCMGX: GFAFX (0.20) vs HCMGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than HCMGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs HCMGX (12 years). HCMGX (1.98) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). HCMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 264.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMGX: GFAFX (250) vs HCMGX (2500). HCMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.55 vs. GFAFX (12.03). HCMGX return over 5 years is better than : 49.31 vs. GFAFX (18.91).
| GFAFX | HCMGX | GFAFX / HCMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.98 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.98 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.691 | 11.623 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 2.22B | 16,239% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.03 | 36.55 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.36 | 66.94 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.91 | 49.31 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.77 | 353.82 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers