Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs HCMSX
GFAFX vs HCMSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs HCMSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.38
Change+$0.21 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
GFAFX vs HCMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. HCMSX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and HCMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. HCMSX (1.88B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than HCMSX: GFAFX (0.29) vs HCMSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than HCMSX: GFAFX (25 years) vs HCMSX (11 years). HCMSX (2.76) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). HCMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMSX: GFAFX (250) vs HCMSX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.40 vs. HCMSX (12.41). HCMSX return over 5 years is better than : 63.62 vs. GFAFX (42.23).
| GFAFX | HCMSX | GFAFX / HCMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.25 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.76 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.754 | 7.654 | 206% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 1.88B | 17,650% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.40 | 12.41 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.12 | 59.39 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.23 | 63.62 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.75 | 262.78 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement