Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs HCMSX
GFAFX vs HCMSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs HCMSX
GFAFX vs HCMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. HCMSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and HCMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. HCMSX (2.18B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than HCMSX: GFAFX (0.20) vs HCMSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than HCMSX: GFAFX (25 years) vs HCMSX (12 years). HCMSX (2.76) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). HCMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 264.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMSX: GFAFX (250) vs HCMSX (2500). HCMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.84 vs. GFAFX (4.25). HCMSX return over 5 years is better than : 38.26 vs. GFAFX (15.72).
| GFAFX | HCMSX | GFAFX / HCMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.25 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.76 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.134 | 9.214 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 2.18B | 16,391% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | 22.84 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.15 | 54.06 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.72 | 38.26 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.45 | 303.25 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement