Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs HNASX
GFAFX vs HNASX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs HNASX
GFAFX vs HNASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. HNASX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and HNASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. HNASX (450M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than HNASX: GFAFX (0.20) vs HNASX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than HNASX: GFAFX (25 years) vs HNASX (25 years). HNASX (0.79) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). HNASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNASX: GFAFX (250) vs HNASX (500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. HNASX (-1.85). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.72 vs. HNASX (8.33).
| GFAFX | HNASX | GFAFX / HNASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.79 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.79 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.134 | 2.301 | 310% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 450M | 79,333% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | -1.85 | -230% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.15 | 36.28 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.72 | 8.33 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.45 | 149.30 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement