Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs HSUCX
GFAFX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs HSUCX
GFAFX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. HSUCX commentary
Sep 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and HSUCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. HSUCX (47.1M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than HSUCX: GFAFX (0.20) vs HSUCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: GFAFX (26 years) vs HSUCX (13 years). HSUCX (2.12) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 267.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: GFAFX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.43 vs. HSUCX (-11.69). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.52 vs. HSUCX (-19.73).
| GFAFX | HSUCX | GFAFX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.12 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.12 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.508 | -6.714 | -142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 47.1M | 749,469% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.43 | -11.69 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.69 | 30.63 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.52 | -19.73 | -69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.69 | -18.37 | -581% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement