Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs KLCAX
GFAFX vs KLCAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs KLCAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.11
Change-$0.42 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap A
Price$18.88
Change-$0.10 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
GFAFX vs KLCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. KLCAX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and KLCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. KLCAX (1.3B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than KLCAX: GFAFX (0.29) vs KLCAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than KLCAX: GFAFX (25 years) vs KLCAX (18 years). KLCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCAX (18.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCAX: GFAFX (250) vs KLCAX (1500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.70 vs. KLCAX (-11.14). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.30 vs. KLCAX (-40.43).
| GFAFX | KLCAX | GFAFX / KLCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.09 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.19 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.099 | 15.520 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 1.3B | 26,235% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.70 | -11.14 | -150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.48 | -21.38 | -292% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.30 | -40.43 | -119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.80 | 0.96 | 10,842% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement