Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs KLCAX
GFAFX vs KLCAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs KLCAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$71.96
Change+$0.53 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap A
Price$15.90
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.16B
GFAFX vs KLCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. KLCAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and KLCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. KLCAX (1.16B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than KLCAX: GFAFX (0.35) vs KLCAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than KLCAX: GFAFX (24 years) vs KLCAX (17 years). KLCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCAX (18.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCAX: GFAFX (250) vs KLCAX (1500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.57 vs. KLCAX (-20.28). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.32 vs. KLCAX (-42.30).
| GFAFX | KLCAX | GFAFX / KLCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.09 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.19 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.440 | -3.348 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284B | 1.16B | 24,462% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.57 | -20.28 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.10 | -33.19 | -103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.32 | -42.30 | -105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.32 | -19.23 | -319% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...