Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs KLCAX
GFAFX vs KLCAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs KLCAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$78.20
Change+$0.52 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets312.2B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap A
Price$17.34
Change+$0.08 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.4B
GFAFX vs KLCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. KLCAX commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and KLCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 312B vs. KLCAX (1.4B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than KLCAX: GFAFX (0.45) vs KLCAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than KLCAX: GFAFX (24 years) vs KLCAX (17 years). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. KLCAX (19.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCAX: GFAFX (250) vs KLCAX (1500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.69 vs. KLCAX (-8.59). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.69 vs. KLCAX (-40.10).
| GFAFX | KLCAX | GFAFX / KLCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.020 | 5.539 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 312B | 1.4B | 22,286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.69 | -8.59 | -264% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.48 | -40.43 | -53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.69 | -40.10 | -126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.15 | -5.56 | -1,515% |