Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs KLCAX
GFAFX vs KLCAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs KLCAX
GFAFX vs KLCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. KLCAX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and KLCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. KLCAX (1.16B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than KLCAX: GFAFX (0.20) vs KLCAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than KLCAX: GFAFX (25 years) vs KLCAX (19 years). KLCAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCAX (18.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCAX: GFAFX (250) vs KLCAX (1500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.27 vs. KLCAX (-3.57). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 19.47 vs. KLCAX (-54.67).
| GFAFX | KLCAX | GFAFX / KLCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.09 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.20 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.347 | 14.306 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 1.16B | 31,174% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.27 | -3.57 | -287% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.68 | -23.05 | -194% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.47 | -54.67 | -36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.13 | -9.96 | -1,116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers