Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LCGNX
GFAFX vs LCGNX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LCGNX
GFAFX vs LCGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LCGNX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and LCGNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. LCGNX (1.88B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LCGNX: GFAFX (0.20) vs LCGNX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LCGNX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LCGNX (27 years). LCGNX (1.02) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). LCGNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCGNX: GFAFX (250) vs LCGNX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. LCGNX (-1.76). LCGNX return over 5 years is better than : 20.70 vs. GFAFX (15.72).
| GFAFX | LCGNX | GFAFX / LCGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.90 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.02 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.134 | 2.861 | 249% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 1.88B | 18,989% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | -1.76 | -241% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.15 | 35.95 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.72 | 20.70 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.45 | 172.99 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement