Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LCGNX
GFAFX vs LCGNX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LCGNX
GFAFX vs LCGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LCGNX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and LCGNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. LCGNX (1.78B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LCGNX: GFAFX (0.20) vs LCGNX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LCGNX: GFAFX (26 years) vs LCGNX (27 years). LCGNX (1.02) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). LCGNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCGNX: GFAFX (250) vs LCGNX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.02 vs. LCGNX (-9.32). LCGNX return over 5 years is better than : 15.19 vs. GFAFX (13.04).
| GFAFX | LCGNX | GFAFX / LCGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.90 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.02 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.043 | 0.797 | 1,135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 1.78B | 19,887% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.02 | -9.32 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.74 | 33.67 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.04 | 15.19 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.25 | 172.22 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers