Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs LEGCX
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LEGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$76.03
Change-$1.83 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.33B
Columbia Large Cap Growth C
Price$50.46
Change-$1.17 (-2.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.07B
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LEGCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and LEGCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. LEGCX (6.07B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LEGCX: GFAFX (0.45) vs LEGCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LEGCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LEGCX (22 years). LEGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. GFAFX (31.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEGCX: GFAFX (250) vs LEGCX (2000). GFAFX (12.28) and LEGCX (12.26) have marching annual gain over last year. GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.32 vs. LEGCX (36.19).
| GFAFX | LEGCX | GFAFX / LEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.078 | 1.244 | 247% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304B | 6.07B | 5,011% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.28 | 12.26 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.02 | 31.00 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.32 | 36.19 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.87 | 58.83 | 124% |