Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LEGCX
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LEGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$81.99
Change+$0.81 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
Columbia Large Cap Growth C
Price$52.59
Change+$0.72 (+1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.18B
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LEGCX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and LEGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. LEGCX (6.18B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LEGCX: GFAFX (0.30) vs LEGCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LEGCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LEGCX (23 years). LEGCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LEGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEGCX: GFAFX (250) vs LEGCX (2000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.79 vs. LEGCX (3.16). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.37 vs. LEGCX (36.38).
| GFAFX | LEGCX | GFAFX / LEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.73 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.73 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.158 | 5.518 | 202% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 6.18B | 5,229% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.79 | 3.16 | 342% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.64 | 63.78 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.37 | 36.38 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.25 | 62.57 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers