Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LEGCX
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LEGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$83.56
Change+$0.28 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.05B
Columbia Large Cap Growth C
Price$53.90
Change+$0.22 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.24B
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LEGCX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and LEGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. LEGCX (6.24B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LEGCX: GFAFX (0.30) vs LEGCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LEGCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LEGCX (23 years). LEGCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LEGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEGCX: GFAFX (250) vs LEGCX (2000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.70 vs. LEGCX (12.37). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.82 vs. LEGCX (36.97).
| GFAFX | LEGCX | GFAFX / LEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.73 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.73 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.286 | 7.705 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 6.24B | 5,242% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.70 | 12.37 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.41 | 62.72 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.82 | 36.97 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.50 | 62.18 | 139% |