Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LEGCX
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LEGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.09
Change+$1.11 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Columbia Cornerstone Growth C
Price$56.81
Change+$0.66 (+1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.45B
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LEGCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and LEGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. LEGCX (6.45B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LEGCX: GFAFX (0.29) vs LEGCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LEGCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LEGCX (23 years). LEGCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LEGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEGCX: GFAFX (250) vs LEGCX (2000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.33 vs. LEGCX (8.19). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.94 vs. LEGCX (31.07).
| GFAFX | LEGCX | GFAFX / LEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.73 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.73 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.428 | 12.661 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 6.45B | 5,222% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.33 | 8.19 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.02 | 80.20 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.94 | 31.07 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.90 | 76.35 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement