Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LEGCX
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LEGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$77.48
Change-$0.93 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.97B
Columbia Large Cap Growth C
Price$49.48
Change-$0.69 (-1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.91B
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LEGCX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and LEGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. LEGCX (5.91B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LEGCX: GFAFX (0.32) vs LEGCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LEGCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LEGCX (23 years). LEGCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LEGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEGCX: GFAFX (250) vs LEGCX (2000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.20 vs. LEGCX (0.86). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.10 vs. LEGCX (37.64).
| GFAFX | LEGCX | GFAFX / LEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.73 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.73 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.043 | 0.662 | 762% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 310B | 5.91B | 5,246% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.20 | 0.86 | 832% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.37 | 60.90 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.10 | 37.64 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.97 | 53.71 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement