Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs LEGCX
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LEGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$70.20
Change+$0.72 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.25B
Columbia Large Cap Growth C
Price$45.07
Change+$0.43 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.32B
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LEGCX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and LEGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 275B vs. LEGCX (5.32B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LEGCX: GFAFX (0.35) vs LEGCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LEGCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LEGCX (22 years). LEGCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LEGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEGCX: GFAFX (250) vs LEGCX (2000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.81 vs. LEGCX (-1.50). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 71.15 vs. LEGCX (52.98).
| GFAFX | LEGCX | GFAFX / LEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.73 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.73 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.826 | -10.433 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 275B | 5.32B | 5,172% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.81 | -1.50 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.95 | 8.93 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.15 | 52.98 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.39 | 40.47 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...