Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LEGCX
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LEGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.29
Change-$0.82 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.37B
Columbia Cornerstone Growth C
Price$55.69
Change-$0.26 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.47B
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LEGCX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and LEGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. LEGCX (6.47B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LEGCX: GFAFX (0.29) vs LEGCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LEGCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LEGCX (23 years). LEGCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LEGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEGCX: GFAFX (250) vs LEGCX (2000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.86 vs. LEGCX (9.88). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.35 vs. LEGCX (37.30).
| GFAFX | LEGCX | GFAFX / LEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.73 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.73 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.988 | 12.259 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 6.47B | 5,227% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.86 | 9.88 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.78 | 81.83 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.35 | 37.30 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.37 | 92.73 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers