Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs LEGCX
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LEGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$68.86
Change+$1.71 (+2.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets267.42B
Columbia Large Cap Growth C
Price$44.36
Change+$1.33 (+3.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.09B
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LEGCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and LEGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 267B vs. LEGCX (5.09B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LEGCX: GFAFX (0.35) vs LEGCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LEGCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LEGCX (22 years). LEGCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LEGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEGCX: GFAFX (250) vs LEGCX (2000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.48 vs. LEGCX (-2.60). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.27 vs. LEGCX (27.61).
| GFAFX | LEGCX | GFAFX / LEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.73 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.73 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.643 | -13.664 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 267B | 5.09B | 5,242% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.48 | -2.60 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.34 | 14.29 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.27 | 27.61 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.35 | 33.38 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers