Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LEGCX
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LEGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$84.29
Change+$0.32 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.31B
Columbia Cornerstone Growth C
Price$54.39
Change+$0.53 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.31B
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LEGCX commentary
Sep 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and LEGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. LEGCX (6.31B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LEGCX: GFAFX (0.29) vs LEGCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LEGCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LEGCX (23 years). LEGCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LEGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEGCX: GFAFX (250) vs LEGCX (2000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.34 vs. LEGCX (11.01). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.42 vs. LEGCX (28.30).
| GFAFX | LEGCX | GFAFX / LEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.73 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.73 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.276 | 8.066 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 6.31B | 5,201% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.34 | 11.01 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.34 | 62.92 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.42 | 28.30 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.94 | 79.12 | 129% |