Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LEGCX
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LEGCX
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LEGCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and LEGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. LEGCX (6.72B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LEGCX: GFAFX (0.20) vs LEGCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LEGCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LEGCX (24 years). LEGCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). LEGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEGCX: GFAFX (250) vs LEGCX (2000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. LEGCX (3.46). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.72 vs. LEGCX (14.28).
| GFAFX | LEGCX | GFAFX / LEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.72 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.72 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.134 | 6.642 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 6.72B | 5,316% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | 3.46 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.15 | 32.82 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.72 | 14.28 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.45 | 89.79 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement