Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LEGCX
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LEGCX
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LEGCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and LEGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. LEGCX (6.64B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LEGCX: GFAFX (0.20) vs LEGCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LEGCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LEGCX (24 years). LEGCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). LEGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEGCX: GFAFX (250) vs LEGCX (2000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.53 vs. LEGCX (7.08). LEGCX return over 5 years is better than : 16.56 vs. GFAFX (15.46).
| GFAFX | LEGCX | GFAFX / LEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.72 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.72 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.330 | 5.262 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 6.64B | 5,435% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | 7.08 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.13 | 36.39 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.46 | 16.56 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.04 | 98.77 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement