Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLAX
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.39
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$54.11
Change+$0.47 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.6B
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and LGLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. LGLAX (7.6B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLAX: GFAFX (0.28) vs LGLAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLAX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LGLAX (14 years). LGLAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: GFAFX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.40 vs. GFAFX (6.88). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.10 vs. LGLAX (17.43).
| GFAFX | LGLAX | GFAFX / LGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.90 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.90 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.767 | 13.548 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 7.6B | 4,303% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.88 | 13.40 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.71 | 105.75 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.10 | 17.43 | 196% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.41 | 124.15 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers