Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLAX
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$83.63
Change+$0.07 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$52.49
Change+$0.31 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.55B
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLAX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and LGLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. LGLAX (7.55B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLAX: GFAFX (0.30) vs LGLAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLAX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LGLAX (14 years). LGLAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: GFAFX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.81 vs. GFAFX (16.46). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.33 vs. LGLAX (35.85).
| GFAFX | LGLAX | GFAFX / LGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.90 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.90 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.286 | 10.457 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 7.55B | 4,342% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.46 | 36.81 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.95 | 76.52 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.33 | 35.85 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.10 | 114.20 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement