Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLAX
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.38
Change+$0.21 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$54.73
Change+$0.75 (+1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.88B
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLAX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and LGLAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. LGLAX (7.88B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLAX: GFAFX (0.29) vs LGLAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLAX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LGLAX (14 years). LGLAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: GFAFX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.64 vs. GFAFX (18.40). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.23 vs. LGLAX (34.31).
| GFAFX | LGLAX | GFAFX / LGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.90 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.90 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.754 | 15.855 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 7.88B | 4,211% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.40 | 42.64 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.12 | 97.58 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.23 | 34.31 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.75 | 142.06 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement