Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLAX
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.75
Change-$0.57 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$56.79
Change-$0.15 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.15B
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and LGLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. LGLAX (8.15B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLAX: GFAFX (0.29) vs LGLAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLAX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LGLAX (14 years). LGLAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: GFAFX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.61 vs. GFAFX (15.06). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.85 vs. LGLAX (28.24).
| GFAFX | LGLAX | GFAFX / LGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.90 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.90 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.967 | 20.533 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 8.15B | 4,207% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.06 | 36.61 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.70 | 119.76 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.85 | 28.24 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.69 | 149.63 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement