Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs LGLAX
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$76.03
Change-$1.83 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.33B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$47.90
Change-$1.78 (-3.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.16B
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLAX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and LGLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. LGLAX (7.16B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLAX: GFAFX (0.45) vs LGLAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLAX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LGLAX (14 years). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 120.00 vs. GFAFX (31.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: GFAFX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.63 vs. GFAFX (12.28). LGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 53.04 vs. GFAFX (42.32).
| GFAFX | LGLAX | GFAFX / LGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.078 | 1.397 | 220% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304B | 7.16B | 4,245% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.28 | 27.63 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.02 | 43.33 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.32 | 53.04 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.87 | 105.93 | 69% |