Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLAX
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$77.80
Change+$0.75 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.87B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$48.93
Change+$0.50 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.06B
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and LGLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 305B vs. LGLAX (7.06B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLAX: GFAFX (0.32) vs LGLAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLAX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LGLAX (14 years). LGLAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: GFAFX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.51 vs. GFAFX (9.27). GFAFX (45.12) and LGLAX (43.92) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GFAFX | LGLAX | GFAFX / LGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.90 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.90 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.477 | 2.519 | 217% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305B | 7.06B | 4,321% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.27 | 23.51 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.44 | 64.90 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.12 | 43.92 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.15 | 106.00 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers