Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs LGLAX
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$71.87
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$43.80
Change-$0.29 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.42B
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLAX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and LGLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. LGLAX (6.42B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLAX: GFAFX (0.35) vs LGLAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLAX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LGLAX (14 years). LGLAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: GFAFX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.17 vs. GFAFX (3.06). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.14 vs. LGLAX (38.21).
| GFAFX | LGLAX | GFAFX / LGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.90 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.90 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.562 | -7.282 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 6.42B | 4,442% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.06 | 17.17 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.97 | 55.60 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.14 | 38.21 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.41 | 90.85 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...