Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs LGLAX
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$65.59
Change+$0.05 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.04B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$39.25
Change-$0.06 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.72B
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and LGLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. LGLAX (5.72B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLAX: GFAFX (0.35) vs LGLAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLAX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LGLAX (14 years). LGLAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: GFAFX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.17 vs. GFAFX (-2.92). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.08 vs. LGLAX (35.18).
| GFAFX | LGLAX | GFAFX / LGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.91 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.91 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.076 | -16.787 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 5.72B | 4,565% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.92 | 7.17 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.17 | 20.10 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.08 | 35.18 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.66 | 68.14 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...