Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLAX
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLAX
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and LGLAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. LGLAX (7.93B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLAX: GFAFX (0.20) vs LGLAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLAX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LGLAX (15 years). LGLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: GFAFX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.52 vs. GFAFX (4.25). LGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 22.91 vs. GFAFX (15.72).
| GFAFX | LGLAX | GFAFX / LGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.89 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.89 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.134 | 8.667 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 7.93B | 4,504% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | 15.52 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.15 | 89.52 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.72 | 22.91 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.45 | 161.43 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement