Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLAX
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLAX
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLAX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and LGLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. LGLAX (7.75B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLAX: GFAFX (0.20) vs LGLAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLAX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LGLAX (15 years). LGLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: GFAFX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.12 vs. GFAFX (8.46). LGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.42 vs. GFAFX (18.04).
| GFAFX | LGLAX | GFAFX / LGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.89 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.89 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.581 | 5.710 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 7.75B | 4,656% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.46 | 17.12 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.57 | 93.20 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.04 | 26.42 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.81 | 161.69 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers