Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLFX
GFAFX vs LGLFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.47
Change+$0.62 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.84B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$59.50
Change+$0.64 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.11B
GFAFX vs LGLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLFX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and LGLFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. LGLFX (8.11B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLFX: GFAFX (0.29) vs LGLFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LGLFX (14 years). LGLFX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: LGLFX (0) vs GFAFX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.41 vs. GFAFX (16.86). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.65 vs. LGLFX (40.41).
| GFAFX | LGLFX | GFAFX / LGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.747 | 19.561 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 8.11B | 4,167% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.86 | 40.41 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.00 | 103.74 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.65 | 40.41 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.19 | 156.25 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers