Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs LGLFX
GFAFX vs LGLFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$66.54
Change+$1.04 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$41.57
Change+$0.63 (+1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.72B
GFAFX vs LGLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLFX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and LGLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. LGLFX (5.72B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLFX: GFAFX (0.35) vs LGLFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLFX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LGLFX (14 years). LGLFX (0.76) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: LGLFX (0) vs GFAFX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.46 vs. GFAFX (-5.32). LGLFX (49.47) and GFAFX (47.17) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GFAFX | LGLFX | GFAFX / LGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.66 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.76 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.789 | -16.839 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 5.72B | 4,565% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.32 | 1.46 | -364% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.81 | 20.73 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.17 | 49.47 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.37 | 74.73 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...