Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs LGLFX
GFAFX vs LGLFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$71.96
Change+$0.53 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$45.99
Change+$0.65 (+1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.32B
GFAFX vs LGLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and LGLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. LGLFX (6.32B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLFX: GFAFX (0.35) vs LGLFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLFX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LGLFX (14 years). LGLFX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: LGLFX (0) vs GFAFX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.47 vs. GFAFX (3.57). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.32 vs. LGLFX (40.11).
| GFAFX | LGLFX | GFAFX / LGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.440 | -7.902 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284B | 6.32B | 4,496% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.57 | 16.47 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.10 | 57.49 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.32 | 40.11 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.32 | 95.77 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers