Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLFX
GFAFX vs LGLFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$84.36
Change+$1.61 (+1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.96B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$56.27
Change+$0.87 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.78B
GFAFX vs LGLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLFX commentary
Aug 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and LGLFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. LGLFX (7.78B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLFX: GFAFX (0.30) vs LGLFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLFX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LGLFX (14 years). LGLFX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: LGLFX (0) vs GFAFX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.68 vs. GFAFX (14.57). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.75 vs. LGLFX (34.14).
| GFAFX | LGLFX | GFAFX / LGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.371 | 14.300 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 7.78B | 4,231% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | 34.68 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.92 | 82.69 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.75 | 34.14 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.19 | 161.84 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement