Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLFX
GFAFX vs LGLFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$81.99
Change+$0.81 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets319.78B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$53.27
Change+$0.69 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.32B
GFAFX vs LGLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLFX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and LGLFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 320B vs. LGLFX (7.32B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLFX: GFAFX (0.30) vs LGLFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLFX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LGLFX (14 years). LGLFX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: LGLFX (0) vs GFAFX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.22 vs. GFAFX (10.79). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.37 vs. LGLFX (39.21).
| GFAFX | LGLFX | GFAFX / LGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.158 | 6.805 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 320B | 7.32B | 4,372% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.79 | 22.22 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.64 | 88.80 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.37 | 39.21 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.25 | 122.51 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement