Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLFX
GFAFX vs LGLFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$78.41
Change-$0.07 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets310.29B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$50.63
Change-$0.09 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.08B
GFAFX vs LGLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLFX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and LGLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. LGLFX (7.08B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLFX: GFAFX (0.32) vs LGLFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLFX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LGLFX (14 years). LGLFX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: LGLFX (0) vs GFAFX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.93 vs. GFAFX (8.50). GFAFX (50.89) and LGLFX (48.87) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GFAFX | LGLFX | GFAFX / LGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.304 | 3.027 | 208% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 310B | 7.08B | 4,379% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.50 | 20.93 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.91 | 87.50 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.89 | 48.87 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.70 | 113.11 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement