Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLFX
GFAFX vs LGLFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.41
Change+$0.66 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$60.13
Change+$0.82 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.13B
GFAFX vs LGLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and LGLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. LGLFX (8.13B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLFX: GFAFX (0.29) vs LGLFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LGLFX (14 years). LGLFX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: LGLFX (0) vs GFAFX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.88 vs. GFAFX (14.72). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.28 vs. LGLFX (28.57).
| GFAFX | LGLFX | GFAFX / LGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.862 | 20.475 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 8.13B | 4,194% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.72 | 33.88 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.01 | 120.89 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.28 | 28.57 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.23 | 158.54 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement