Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLFX
GFAFX vs LGLFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.33
Change+$0.55 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.05B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$58.07
Change+$0.51 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.85B
GFAFX vs LGLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLFX commentary
Nov 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and LGLFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. LGLFX (7.85B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLFX: GFAFX (0.28) vs LGLFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LGLFX (14 years). LGLFX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: LGLFX (0) vs GFAFX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.53 vs. GFAFX (9.20). GFAFX (34.24) and LGLFX (32.64) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GFAFX | LGLFX | GFAFX / LGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.753 | 17.957 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 7.85B | 4,331% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.20 | 17.53 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.08 | 117.57 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.24 | 32.64 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.09 | 151.71 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement