Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLSX
GFAFX vs LGLSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLSX
GFAFX vs LGLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLSX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and LGLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. LGLSX (7.63B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLSX: GFAFX (0.20) vs LGLSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLSX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LGLSX (11 years). LGLSX (0.89) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). LGLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). LGLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: LGLSX (0) vs GFAFX (250). LGLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.98 vs. GFAFX (-0.57). LGLSX return over 5 years is better than : 15.15 vs. GFAFX (10.50).
| GFAFX | LGLSX | GFAFX / LGLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.89 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.89 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.768 | 4.944 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 7.63B | 4,679% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.57 | 8.98 | -6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.34 | 84.27 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.50 | 15.15 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.91 | 150.16 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement