Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLSX
GFAFX vs LGLSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLSX
GFAFX vs LGLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and LGLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. LGLSX (8.03B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLSX: GFAFX (0.20) vs LGLSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLSX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LGLSX (11 years). LGLSX (0.89) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). LGLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). LGLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: LGLSX (0) vs GFAFX (250). LGLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.17 vs. GFAFX (8.53). LGLSX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. GFAFX (15.46).
| GFAFX | LGLSX | GFAFX / LGLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.89 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.89 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.330 | 9.275 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 8.03B | 4,498% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | 22.17 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.13 | 100.79 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.46 | 27.39 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.04 | 177.05 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement