Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MBCZX
GFAFX vs MBCZX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MBCZX
GFAFX vs MBCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MBCZX commentary
Sep 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and MBCZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. MBCZX (1.8B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MBCZX: GFAFX (0.20) vs MBCZX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MBCZX: GFAFX (26 years) vs MBCZX (12 years). MBCZX (0.66) and GFAFX (0.65) have similar cost to investors . GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MBCZX (14.00). MBCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: MBCZX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.16 vs. MBCZX (-29.10). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.71 vs. MBCZX (-44.83).
| GFAFX | MBCZX | GFAFX / MBCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.66 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.66 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.779 | 0.312 | 2,811% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 1.8B | 19,600% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.16 | -29.10 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.15 | -13.59 | -325% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.71 | -44.83 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.07 | 20.51 | 507% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers