Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MCGFX
GFAFX vs MCGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MCGFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.38
Change+$0.21 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth N
Price$13.81
Change-$0.10 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets211.86M
GFAFX vs MCGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MCGFX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and MCGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. MCGFX (212M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MCGFX: GFAFX (0.29) vs MCGFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MCGFX: GFAFX (24 years) vs MCGFX (31 years). MCGFX (0.97) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: GFAFX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.40 vs. MCGFX (6.75). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.23 vs. MCGFX (-37.68).
| GFAFX | MCGFX | GFAFX / MCGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.91 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.97 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.754 | 13.644 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 212M | 156,604% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.40 | 6.75 | 272% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.12 | 33.09 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.23 | -37.68 | -112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.75 | -45.33 | -220% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement