Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs MCGFX
GFAFX vs MCGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MCGFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$66.54
Change+$1.04 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth N
Price$11.11
Change+$0.19 (+1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.29M
GFAFX vs MCGFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MCGFX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and MCGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. MCGFX (175M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MCGFX: GFAFX (0.35) vs MCGFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MCGFX: GFAFX (24 years) vs MCGFX (30 years). MCGFX (0.97) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: GFAFX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.32 vs. MCGFX (-13.88). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.17 vs. MCGFX (-35.78).
| GFAFX | MCGFX | GFAFX / MCGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.91 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.97 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.789 | -10.784 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 175M | 149,143% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.32 | -13.88 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.81 | -9.13 | -75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.17 | -35.78 | -132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.37 | -57.87 | -87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...