Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs MCGFX
GFAFX vs MCGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MCGFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$71.96
Change+$0.53 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth N
Price$11.96
Change+$0.04 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets189.21M
GFAFX vs MCGFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MCGFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and MCGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. MCGFX (189M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MCGFX: GFAFX (0.35) vs MCGFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MCGFX: GFAFX (24 years) vs MCGFX (31 years). MCGFX (0.97) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: GFAFX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.57 vs. MCGFX (-5.62). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.32 vs. MCGFX (-35.98).
| GFAFX | MCGFX | GFAFX / MCGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.91 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.97 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.440 | -2.614 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284B | 189M | 150,265% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.57 | -5.62 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.10 | 14.27 | 239% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.32 | -35.98 | -123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.32 | -53.94 | -114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...