Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MCGFX
GFAFX vs MCGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MCGFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.29
Change-$0.82 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.37B
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth N
Price$14.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets210.3M
GFAFX vs MCGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MCGFX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and MCGFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. MCGFX (210M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MCGFX: GFAFX (0.29) vs MCGFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MCGFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MCGFX (31 years). MCGFX (0.97) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: GFAFX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.86 vs. MCGFX (5.25). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.35 vs. MCGFX (-35.00).
| GFAFX | MCGFX | GFAFX / MCGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.91 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.97 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.988 | 14.706 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 210M | 160,952% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.86 | 5.25 | 245% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.78 | 44.54 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.35 | -35.00 | -135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.37 | -42.10 | -272% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement