Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs MCGFX
GFAFX vs MCGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MCGFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$76.03
Change-$1.83 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.33B
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth N
Price$12.47
Change-$0.20 (-1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.59M
GFAFX vs MCGFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MCGFX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and MCGFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. MCGFX (206M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MCGFX: GFAFX (0.45) vs MCGFX (0.25). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MCGFX: GFAFX (24 years) vs MCGFX (30 years). MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. GFAFX (31.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: GFAFX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.28 vs. MCGFX (-2.04). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.32 vs. MCGFX (-36.27).
| GFAFX | MCGFX | GFAFX / MCGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.078 | 1.879 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304B | 206M | 147,573% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.25 | 183% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.28 | -2.04 | -601% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.02 | 3.43 | 672% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.32 | -36.27 | -117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.87 | -51.74 | -141% |