Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MCGFX
GFAFX vs MCGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MCGFX
GFAFX vs MCGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MCGFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and MCGFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MCGFX (212M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MCGFX: GFAFX (0.20) vs MCGFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MCGFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MCGFX (32 years). MCGFX (0.96) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: GFAFX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.53 vs. MCGFX (-8.88). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.46 vs. MCGFX (-26.12).
| GFAFX | MCGFX | GFAFX / MCGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.90 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.96 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.330 | 18.182 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 212M | 170,283% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | -8.88 | -96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.13 | 8.43 | 535% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.46 | -26.12 | -59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.04 | -38.90 | -291% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers