Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs MLACX
GFAFX vs MLACX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MLACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$65.50
Change-$2.68 (-3.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.59B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth
Price$3.74
Change-$0.16 (-4.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.04B
GFAFX vs MLACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MLACX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and MLACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 272B vs. MLACX (12B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MLACX: GFAFX (0.35) vs MLACX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MLACX: GFAFX (24 years) vs MLACX (20 years). MLACX (1.89) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLACX: GFAFX (250) vs MLACX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.11 vs. MLACX (-32.85). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.80 vs. MLACX (-41.47).
| GFAFX | MLACX | GFAFX / MLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.88 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.89 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.565 | -12.821 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 272B | 12B | 2,267% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.11 | -32.85 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.06 | -40.82 | -22% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.80 | -41.47 | -122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.18 | -60.71 | -89% |