Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MLACX
GFAFX vs MLACX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MLACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$84.36
Change+$1.61 (+1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.96B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth
Price$4.73
Change+$0.06 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.82B
GFAFX vs MLACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MLACX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and MLACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. MLACX (13.8B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MLACX: GFAFX (0.30) vs MLACX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MLACX: GFAFX (24 years) vs MLACX (20 years). MLACX (1.89) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLACX: GFAFX (250) vs MLACX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. MLACX (-20.10). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.75 vs. MLACX (-45.32).
| GFAFX | MLACX | GFAFX / MLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.88 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.89 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.371 | 10.256 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 13.8B | 2,384% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | -20.10 | -72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.92 | -17.45 | -286% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.75 | -45.32 | -92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.19 | -45.88 | -236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement