Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MLACX
GFAFX vs MLACX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MLACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.47
Change+$0.62 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.84B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth
Price$4.89
Change+$0.06 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.22B
GFAFX vs MLACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MLACX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and MLACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. MLACX (14.2B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MLACX: GFAFX (0.29) vs MLACX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MLACX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MLACX (20 years). MLACX (1.89) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLACX: GFAFX (250) vs MLACX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.86 vs. MLACX (-17.54). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.65 vs. MLACX (-42.81).
| GFAFX | MLACX | GFAFX / MLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.88 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.89 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.747 | 13.986 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 14.2B | 2,380% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.86 | -17.54 | -96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.00 | -8.26 | -751% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.65 | -42.81 | -107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.19 | -47.48 | -217% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement