Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MLACX
GFAFX vs MLACX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MLACX
GFAFX vs MLACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MLACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and MLACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MLACX (12.7B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MLACX: GFAFX (0.20) vs MLACX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MLACX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MLACX (21 years). MLACX (1.86) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). MLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLACX: GFAFX (250) vs MLACX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.53 vs. MLACX (-35.71). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.46 vs. MLACX (-70.46).
| GFAFX | MLACX | GFAFX / MLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.85 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.86 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.330 | 4.727 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 12.7B | 2,843% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | -35.71 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.13 | -44.19 | -102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.46 | -70.46 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.04 | -62.60 | -181% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers