Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MLACX
GFAFX vs MLACX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MLACX
GFAFX vs MLACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MLACX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and MLACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. MLACX (11.5B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MLACX: GFAFX (0.20) vs MLACX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MLACX: GFAFX (26 years) vs MLACX (21 years). MLACX (1.86) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). MLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLACX: GFAFX (250) vs MLACX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.02 vs. MLACX (-42.03). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.04 vs. MLACX (-73.71).
| GFAFX | MLACX | GFAFX / MLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.85 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.86 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.043 | 1.818 | 497% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 11.5B | 3,070% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.02 | -42.03 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.74 | -47.27 | -90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.04 | -73.71 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.25 | -65.60 | -162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement