Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MLINX
GFAFX vs MLINX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MLINX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$77.80
Change+$0.75 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.87B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Inv Class
Price$9.55
Change+$0.08 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.49B
GFAFX vs MLINX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MLINX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and MLINX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 305B vs. MLINX (13.5B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MLINX: GFAFX (0.32) vs MLINX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MLINX: GFAFX (24 years) vs MLINX (17 years). MLINX (1.14) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MLINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLINX: GFAFX (250) vs MLINX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.27 vs. MLINX (-4.02). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.12 vs. MLINX (-2.65).
| GFAFX | MLINX | GFAFX / MLINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.13 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.14 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.477 | 5.759 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305B | 13.5B | 2,259% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.27 | -4.02 | -230% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.44 | 13.29 | 282% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.12 | -2.65 | -1,702% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.15 | -7.55 | -995% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers