Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MLINX
GFAFX vs MLINX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MLINX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$83.19
Change+$0.26 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.99B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Inv Class
Price$10.11
Change+$0.04 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.06B
GFAFX vs MLINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MLINX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and MLINX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. MLINX (14.1B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MLINX: GFAFX (0.30) vs MLINX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MLINX: GFAFX (24 years) vs MLINX (17 years). MLINX (1.14) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MLINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLINX: GFAFX (250) vs MLINX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.48 vs. MLINX (3.91). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.86 vs. MLINX (-7.67).
| GFAFX | MLINX | GFAFX / MLINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.13 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.14 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.785 | 11.960 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325B | 14.1B | 2,305% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.48 | 3.91 | 473% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.32 | 18.80 | 252% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.86 | -7.67 | -559% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.51 | -5.78 | -1,480% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement