Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MLINX
GFAFX vs MLINX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MLINX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.57
Change-$2.71 (-3.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.85B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Inv Class
Price$10.23
Change-$0.34 (-3.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.69B
GFAFX vs MLINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MLINX commentary
Oct 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and MLINX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. MLINX (13.7B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MLINX: GFAFX (0.29) vs MLINX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MLINX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MLINX (18 years). MLINX (1.14) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MLINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLINX: GFAFX (250) vs MLINX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.35 vs. MLINX (-4.57). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.71 vs. MLINX (-12.26).
| GFAFX | MLINX | GFAFX / MLINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.13 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.14 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.011 | 13.289 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 13.7B | 2,423% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.35 | -4.57 | -226% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.60 | 42.08 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.71 | -12.26 | -307% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.83 | 0.89 | 11,247% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement