Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MLINX
GFAFX vs MLINX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MLINX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.06
Change+$0.24 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.32B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Inv Class
Price$10.43
Change+$0.10 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.5B
GFAFX vs MLINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MLINX commentary
Sep 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and MLINX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. MLINX (14.5B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MLINX: GFAFX (0.29) vs MLINX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MLINX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MLINX (18 years). MLINX (1.14) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MLINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLINX: GFAFX (250) vs MLINX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.74 vs. MLINX (-1.14). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.92 vs. MLINX (-3.78).
| GFAFX | MLINX | GFAFX / MLINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.13 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.14 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.387 | 15.504 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 342B | 14.5B | 2,359% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.74 | -1.14 | -1,383% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.20 | 33.38 | 195% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.92 | -3.78 | -1,320% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.03 | 3.47 | 3,140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement