Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MLINX
GFAFX vs MLINX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MLINX
GFAFX vs MLINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MLINX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and MLINX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. MLINX (12.6B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MLINX: GFAFX (0.20) vs MLINX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MLINX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MLINX (18 years). MLINX (1.11) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). MLINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLINX: GFAFX (250) vs MLINX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. MLINX (-14.75). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.72 vs. MLINX (-37.57).
| GFAFX | MLINX | GFAFX / MLINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.10 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.11 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.134 | 3.053 | 234% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 12.6B | 2,833% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | -14.75 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.15 | -2.31 | -1,691% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.72 | -37.57 | -42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.45 | -8.06 | -1,271% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement