Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MLRMX
GFAFX vs MLRMX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MLRMX
GFAFX vs MLRMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MLRMX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and MLRMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. MLRMX (12.6B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MLRMX: GFAFX (0.20) vs MLRMX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MLRMX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MLRMX (6 years). MLRMX (1.19) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). MLRMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLRMX: GFAFX (250) vs MLRMX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. MLRMX (-15.05). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.72 vs. MLRMX (-38.47).
| GFAFX | MLRMX | GFAFX / MLRMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.18 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.19 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.134 | 3.234 | 221% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 12.6B | 2,833% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | -15.05 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.15 | -3.15 | -1,243% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.72 | -38.47 | -41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement