Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MLRMX
GFAFX vs MLRMX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MLRMX
GFAFX vs MLRMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MLRMX commentary
Aug 08, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and MLRMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. MLRMX (12.2B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MLRMX: GFAFX (0.21) vs MLRMX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MLRMX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MLRMX (6 years). MLRMX (1.19) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). MLRMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLRMX: GFAFX (250) vs MLRMX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.67 vs. MLRMX (-15.82). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.55 vs. MLRMX (-39.06).
| GFAFX | MLRMX | GFAFX / MLRMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.18 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.19 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.980 | 4.602 | 195% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 12.2B | 2,926% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.67 | -15.82 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.39 | -1.06 | -3,909% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.55 | -39.06 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement