Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MLRRX
GFAFX vs MLRRX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MLRRX
GFAFX vs MLRRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MLRRX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and MLRRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. MLRRX (11.5B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MLRRX: GFAFX (0.20) vs MLRRX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MLRRX: GFAFX (26 years) vs MLRRX (21 years). MLRRX (0.80) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). MLRRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). MLRRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: MLRRX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.02 vs. MLRRX (-13.61). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.04 vs. MLRRX (-30.76).
| GFAFX | MLRRX | GFAFX / MLRRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.79 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.80 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.043 | 2.958 | 306% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 11.5B | 3,070% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.02 | -13.61 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.74 | 9.54 | 448% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.04 | -30.76 | -42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.25 | 13.38 | 794% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers