Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MLRSX
GFAFX vs MLRSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MLRSX
GFAFX vs MLRSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MLRSX commentary
Jul 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and MLRSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MLRSX (12.4B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MLRSX: GFAFX (0.20) vs MLRSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MLRSX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MLRSX (13 years). GFAFX (0.65) and MLRSX (0.64) have similar cost to investors . MLRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). MLRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: MLRSX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.42 vs. MLRSX (-8.20). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.40 vs. MLRSX (-20.76).
| GFAFX | MLRSX | GFAFX / MLRSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.63 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.64 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.523 | 4.855 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 12.4B | 2,911% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.42 | -8.20 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.81 | 19.05 | 230% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.40 | -20.76 | -74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.55 | 27.41 | 385% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement