Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MLRTX
GFAFX vs MLRTX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MLRTX
GFAFX vs MLRTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MLRTX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and MLRTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MLRTX (12.8B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MLRTX: GFAFX (0.20) vs MLRTX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MLRTX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MLRTX (21 years). MLRTX (1.05) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). MLRTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). MLRTX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: MLRTX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.03 vs. MLRTX (-8.19). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.91 vs. MLRTX (-31.74).
| GFAFX | MLRTX | GFAFX / MLRTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.04 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.05 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.691 | 5.158 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 12.8B | 2,820% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.03 | -8.19 | -147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.36 | 6.03 | 802% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.91 | -31.74 | -60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.77 | 3.34 | 3,525% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers