Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MRLSX
GFAFX vs MRLSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MRLSX
GFAFX vs MRLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MRLSX commentary
Jun 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and MRLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MRLSX (132M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MRLSX: GFAFX (0.20) vs MRLSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MRLSX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MRLSX (17 years). MRLSX (0.84) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). MRLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MRLSX: GFAFX (250) vs MRLSX (100000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.51 vs. MRLSX (-2.89). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 19.83 vs. MRLSX (5.59).
| GFAFX | MRLSX | GFAFX / MRLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.73 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.84 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.490 | 3.895 | 218% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 132M | 273,485% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.51 | -2.89 | -363% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.22 | 12.24 | 378% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.83 | 5.59 | 355% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.38 | 71.71 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement