Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs NFEPX
GFAFX vs NFEPX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NFEPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$66.25
Change-$3.95 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp Inst
Price$17.56
Change-$1.08 (-5.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
GFAFX vs NFEPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NFEPX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and NFEPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. NFEPX (1.14B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NFEPX: GFAFX (0.35) vs NFEPX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NFEPX: GFAFX (24 years) vs NFEPX (27 years). NFEPX (0.88) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). NFEPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFEPX: GFAFX (250) vs NFEPX (2000). NFEPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.36 vs. GFAFX (0.16). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 71.15 vs. NFEPX (10.10).
| GFAFX | NFEPX | GFAFX / NFEPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.80 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.88 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.826 | -9.821 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 1.14B | 24,561% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.16 | 1.36 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.18 | -5.91 | -88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.15 | 10.10 | 704% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.48 | -11.66 | -519% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...