Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs NFEPX
GFAFX vs NFEPX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NFEPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$82.34
Change+$0.17 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.45B
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp Inst
Price$21.16
Change-$0.05 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.28B
GFAFX vs NFEPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NFEPX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and NFEPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. NFEPX (1.28B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NFEPX: GFAFX (0.30) vs NFEPX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NFEPX: GFAFX (24 years) vs NFEPX (28 years). NFEPX (0.88) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). NFEPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFEPX: GFAFX (250) vs NFEPX (2000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.63 vs. NFEPX (4.59). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.42 vs. NFEPX (-5.10).
| GFAFX | NFEPX | GFAFX / NFEPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.80 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.88 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.632 | 2.612 | 445% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 1.28B | 25,274% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.63 | 4.59 | 210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.91 | 58.64 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.42 | -5.10 | -871% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.47 | 1.87 | 4,509% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement