Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs NQCFX
GFAFX vs NQCFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NQCFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.28
Change-$0.13 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets343.07B
GFAFX vs NQCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NQCFX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and NQCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. NQCFX (9.69M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NQCFX: GFAFX (0.29) vs NQCFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NQCFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs NQCFX (24 years). NQCFX (1.42) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NQCFX (11.05). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCFX: GFAFX (250) vs NQCFX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.75 vs. NQCFX (4.04). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.07 vs. NQCFX (33.24).
| GFAFX | NQCFX | GFAFX / NQCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.42 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.42 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.685 | 14.297 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 9.69M | 3,540,462% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.75 | 4.04 | 341% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.75 | 60.84 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.07 | 33.24 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.55 | 92.41 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement