Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs NQCFX
GFAFX vs NQCFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NQCFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$68.18
Change+$6.48 (+10.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.76B
GFAFX vs NQCFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NQCFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and NQCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 246B vs. NQCFX (7.4M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NQCFX: GFAFX (0.35) vs NQCFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NQCFX: GFAFX (24 years) vs NQCFX (23 years). NQCFX (1.48) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NQCFX (2.47). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCFX: GFAFX (250) vs NQCFX (1000). GFAFX (-12.13) and NQCFX (-12.26) have marching annual gain over last year. GFAFX (36.47) and NQCFX (35.91) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GFAFX | NQCFX | GFAFX / NQCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.48 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.48 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.350 | -12.768 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 246B | 7.4M | 3,323,426% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.13 | -12.26 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.17 | -1.47 | 216% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.47 | 35.91 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.06 | 44.25 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...