Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs NQCFX
GFAFX vs NQCFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NQCFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$84.72
Change+$0.14 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
GFAFX vs NQCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NQCFX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and NQCFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. NQCFX (9.22M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NQCFX: GFAFX (0.30) vs NQCFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NQCFX: GFAFX (24 years) vs NQCFX (24 years). NQCFX (1.42) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NQCFX (11.05). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCFX: GFAFX (250) vs NQCFX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.13 vs. NQCFX (3.47). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.04 vs. NQCFX (27.52).
| GFAFX | NQCFX | GFAFX / NQCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.42 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.42 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.859 | 9.289 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 9.22M | 3,559,028% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.13 | 3.47 | 407% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.63 | 37.06 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.04 | 27.52 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.57 | 87.23 | 111% |