Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs NQCFX
GFAFX vs NQCFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NQCFX
GFAFX vs NQCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NQCFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and NQCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. NQCFX (11M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NQCFX: GFAFX (0.20) vs NQCFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NQCFX: GFAFX (26 years) vs NQCFX (25 years). NQCFX (1.40) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NQCFX (11.83). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCFX: GFAFX (250) vs NQCFX (1000). NQCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.11 vs. GFAFX (0.02). NQCFX return over 5 years is better than : 25.83 vs. GFAFX (13.04).
| GFAFX | NQCFX | GFAFX / NQCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.40 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.40 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.043 | 15.086 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 11M | 3,209,091% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.02 | 13.11 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.74 | 44.02 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.04 | 25.83 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.25 | 114.06 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement