Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs NWCCX
GFAFX vs NWCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.28
Change-$0.13 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets343.07B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG C
Price$46.02
Change+$0.03 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets887.83M
GFAFX vs NWCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NWCCX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and NWCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. NWCCX (888M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: GFAFX (0.29) vs NWCCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWCCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs NWCCX (16 years). NWCCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: GFAFX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.75 vs. NWCCX (-2.81). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.07 vs. NWCCX (7.23).
| GFAFX | NWCCX | GFAFX / NWCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.65 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.83 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.685 | 13.612 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 888M | 38,626% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.75 | -2.81 | -489% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.75 | 53.04 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.07 | 7.23 | 582% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.55 | 8.96 | 1,167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement