Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs NWCCX
GFAFX vs NWCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.39
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG C
Price$44.55
Change+$0.33 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets846.49M
GFAFX vs NWCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NWCCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and NWCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. NWCCX (846M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: GFAFX (0.28) vs NWCCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWCCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs NWCCX (17 years). NWCCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: GFAFX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.88 vs. NWCCX (-9.61). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.10 vs. NWCCX (3.37).
| GFAFX | NWCCX | GFAFX / NWCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.65 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.83 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.767 | 9.239 | 171% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 846M | 38,652% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.88 | -9.61 | -72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.71 | 30.94 | 203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.10 | 3.37 | 1,013% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.41 | -0.11 | -79,162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement