Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs NWCCX
GFAFX vs NWCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$65.54
Change-$1.40 (-2.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.59B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG C
Price$34.33
Change-$0.94 (-2.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets776.23M
GFAFX vs NWCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NWCCX commentary
Apr 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and NWCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 267B vs. NWCCX (776M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: GFAFX (0.35) vs NWCCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWCCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs NWCCX (16 years). NWCCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: GFAFX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.66 vs. NWCCX (-16.34). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.97 vs. NWCCX (8.76).
| GFAFX | NWCCX | GFAFX / NWCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.65 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.83 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.144 | -12.871 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 267B | 776M | 34,407% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.66 | -16.34 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.89 | -9.54 | -51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.97 | 8.76 | 422% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.71 | -17.03 | -286% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...