Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs NWCCX
GFAFX vs NWCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$74.18
Change-$9.64 (-11.50%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG C
Price$41.97
Change-$0.26 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
GFAFX vs NWCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NWCCX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and NWCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 315B vs. NWCCX (911M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: GFAFX (0.45) vs NWCCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWCCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs NWCCX (16 years). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GFAFX (31.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: GFAFX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.22 vs. NWCCX (10.45). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 55.56 vs. NWCCX (27.14).
| GFAFX | NWCCX | GFAFX / NWCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.876 | 10.100 | 335% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 315B | 911M | 34,577% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.22 | 10.45 | 337% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.46 | -8.76 | -211% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.56 | 27.14 | 205% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.31 | 0.55 | 17,660% |