Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs NWCCX
GFAFX vs NWCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWCCX
GFAFX vs NWCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NWCCX commentary
Jul 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and NWCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. NWCCX (963M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: GFAFX (0.20) vs NWCCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWCCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs NWCCX (17 years). NWCCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: GFAFX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.57 vs. NWCCX (-19.07). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.17 vs. NWCCX (-28.29).
| GFAFX | NWCCX | GFAFX / NWCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.65 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.78 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.945 | 7.301 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 963M | 37,072% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.57 | -19.07 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.21 | -5.84 | -654% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.17 | -28.29 | -61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.38 | -5.64 | -1,798% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement