Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs NWCCX
GFAFX vs NWCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWCCX
GFAFX vs NWCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NWCCX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and NWCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. NWCCX (921M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: GFAFX (0.20) vs NWCCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWCCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs NWCCX (17 years). NWCCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: GFAFX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.42 vs. NWCCX (-21.31). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.09 vs. NWCCX (-34.98).
| GFAFX | NWCCX | GFAFX / NWCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.65 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.78 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.299 | 4.294 | 240% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 342B | 921M | 37,134% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.42 | -21.31 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.54 | -7.98 | -545% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.09 | -34.98 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.35 | -9.57 | -1,090% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement