Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs NWCCX
GFAFX vs NWCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWCCX
GFAFX vs NWCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NWCCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and NWCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. NWCCX (1B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: GFAFX (0.20) vs NWCCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWCCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs NWCCX (17 years). NWCCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: GFAFX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.53 vs. NWCCX (-14.82). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.46 vs. NWCCX (-25.80).
| GFAFX | NWCCX | GFAFX / NWCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.65 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.78 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.330 | 7.362 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 1B | 35,956% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | -14.82 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.13 | -0.74 | -6,121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.46 | -25.80 | -60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.04 | 0.84 | 13,530% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers