Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs NWCFX
GFAFX vs NWCFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWCFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.53
Change+$0.06 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$69.69
Change-$0.22 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets869.01M
GFAFX vs NWCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NWCFX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and NWCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. NWCFX (869M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: GFAFX (0.29) vs NWCFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWCFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs NWCFX (12 years). NWCFX (0.69) and GFAFX (0.67) have similar cost to investors . NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: GFAFX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.53 vs. NWCFX (5.70). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.46 vs. NWCFX (37.32).
| GFAFX | NWCFX | GFAFX / NWCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.51 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.69 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.669 | 11.642 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 869M | 39,125% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.53 | 5.70 | 308% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.27 | 59.90 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.46 | 37.32 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.79 | 54.82 | 191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement