Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs NWCFX
GFAFX vs NWCFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWCFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$71.87
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$59.25
Change-$0.05 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets833.27M
GFAFX vs NWCFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NWCFX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and NWCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. NWCFX (833M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: GFAFX (0.35) vs NWCFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWCFX: GFAFX (24 years) vs NWCFX (12 years). NWCFX (0.69) and GFAFX (0.67) have similar cost to investors . NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: GFAFX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.06 vs. NWCFX (-4.13). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.14 vs. NWCFX (38.21).
| GFAFX | NWCFX | GFAFX / NWCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.51 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.69 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.562 | -5.382 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 833M | 34,214% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.06 | -4.13 | -74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.97 | 33.18 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.14 | 38.21 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.41 | 30.58 | 201% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...