Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs NWCFX
GFAFX vs NWCFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWCFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$74.18
Change-$9.64 (-11.50%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$64.89
Change-$0.40 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
GFAFX vs NWCFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NWCFX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and NWCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 315B vs. NWCFX (911M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: GFAFX (0.45) vs NWCFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWCFX: GFAFX (24 years) vs NWCFX (12 years). NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GFAFX (31.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: GFAFX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.22 vs. NWCFX (18.85). NWCFX (57.44) and GFAFX (55.56) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GFAFX | NWCFX | GFAFX / NWCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.876 | 18.412 | 184% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 315B | 911M | 34,577% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.22 | 18.85 | 187% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.46 | 5.77 | 320% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.56 | 57.44 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.31 | 46.48 | 209% |