Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs NWCFX
GFAFX vs NWCFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWCFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$65.59
Change+$0.05 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.04B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$53.34
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets755.4M
GFAFX vs NWCFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NWCFX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and NWCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. NWCFX (755M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: GFAFX (0.35) vs NWCFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWCFX: GFAFX (24 years) vs NWCFX (12 years). NWCFX (0.69) and GFAFX (0.67) have similar cost to investors . NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: GFAFX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.92 vs. NWCFX (-11.07). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.08 vs. NWCFX (31.01).
| GFAFX | NWCFX | GFAFX / NWCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.51 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.69 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.076 | -14.915 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 755M | 34,570% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.92 | -11.07 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.17 | 2.52 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.08 | 31.01 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.66 | 16.40 | 291% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...