Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs NWCFX
GFAFX vs NWCFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWCFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$84.58
Change+$0.58 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$67.89
Change+$0.42 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets875.06M
GFAFX vs NWCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NWCFX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and NWCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. NWCFX (875M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: GFAFX (0.30) vs NWCFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWCFX: GFAFX (24 years) vs NWCFX (12 years). NWCFX (0.69) and GFAFX (0.67) have similar cost to investors . NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: GFAFX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.11 vs. NWCFX (1.92). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.49 vs. NWCFX (23.71).
| GFAFX | NWCFX | GFAFX / NWCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.51 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.69 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.669 | 7.745 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 875M | 37,486% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.11 | 1.92 | 735% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.38 | 46.58 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.49 | 23.71 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.24 | 48.50 | 198% |