Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs NWCFX
GFAFX vs NWCFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWCFX
GFAFX vs NWCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NWCFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and NWCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. NWCFX (933M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: GFAFX (0.21) vs NWCFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWCFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs NWCFX (13 years). NWCFX (0.67) and GFAFX (0.65) have similar cost to investors . NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: GFAFX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.48 vs. NWCFX (-10.89). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.12 vs. NWCFX (-5.77).
| GFAFX | NWCFX | GFAFX / NWCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.54 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.67 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.576 | 5.025 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 933M | 38,264% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.48 | -10.89 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.59 | 17.70 | 201% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.12 | -5.77 | -227% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.18 | 49.68 | 200% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers