Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs NWCFX
GFAFX vs NWCFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWCFX
GFAFX vs NWCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NWCFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and NWCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. NWCFX (918M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: GFAFX (0.20) vs NWCFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWCFX: GFAFX (26 years) vs NWCFX (13 years). NWCFX (0.67) and GFAFX (0.65) have similar cost to investors . NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: GFAFX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.02 vs. NWCFX (-11.91). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.04 vs. NWCFX (-8.82).
| GFAFX | NWCFX | GFAFX / NWCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.54 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.67 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.043 | 4.784 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 918M | 38,453% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.02 | -11.91 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.74 | 19.46 | 220% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.04 | -8.82 | -148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.25 | 51.45 | 207% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers