Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs PAWAX
GFAFX vs PAWAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PAWAX
GFAFX vs PAWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PAWAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and PAWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. PAWAX (13.5B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PAWAX: GFAFX (0.20) vs PAWAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PAWAX: GFAFX (26 years) vs PAWAX (21 years). PAWAX (1.05) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). PAWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.80 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAWAX: GFAFX (250) vs PAWAX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.02 vs. PAWAX (-5.26). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.04 vs. PAWAX (-3.21).
| GFAFX | PAWAX | GFAFX / PAWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.05 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.05 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.043 | 0.587 | 1,539% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 13.5B | 2,615% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.02 | -5.26 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.74 | 24.26 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.04 | -3.21 | -406% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.25 | 83.93 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement