Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs PAWAX
GFAFX vs PAWAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PAWAX
GFAFX vs PAWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PAWAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and PAWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. PAWAX (14.4B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PAWAX: GFAFX (0.20) vs PAWAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PAWAX: GFAFX (25 years) vs PAWAX (21 years). PAWAX (1.05) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). PAWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.80 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAWAX: GFAFX (250) vs PAWAX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. PAWAX (1.31). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.72 vs. PAWAX (-1.81).
| GFAFX | PAWAX | GFAFX / PAWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.05 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.05 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.134 | 1.121 | 636% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 14.4B | 2,479% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | 1.31 | 324% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.15 | 25.90 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.72 | -1.81 | -866% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.45 | 85.86 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement