Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs PIGFX
GFAFX vs PIGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PIGFX
GFAFX vs PIGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PIGFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and PIGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. PIGFX (6.33B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PIGFX: GFAFX (0.20) vs PIGFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PIGFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs PIGFX (24 years). PIGFX (1.01) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. PIGFX (26.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PIGFX: GFAFX (250) vs PIGFX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. PIGFX (-7.29). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.72 vs. PIGFX (-3.73).
| GFAFX | PIGFX | GFAFX / PIGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.99 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.01 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.134 | 4.948 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 6.33B | 5,640% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | -7.29 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.15 | 18.19 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.72 | -3.73 | -421% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.45 | 79.43 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement