Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs PNOCX
GFAFX vs PNOCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PNOCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.41
Change+$0.66 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders C
Price$91.67
Change+$0.55 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.6B
GFAFX vs PNOCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PNOCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and PNOCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. PNOCX (6.6B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PNOCX: GFAFX (0.29) vs PNOCX (0.02). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PNOCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs PNOCX (26 years). PNOCX (1.62) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOCX (22.00). PNOCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: PNOCX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.72 vs. PNOCX (-4.73). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.28 vs. PNOCX (0.79).
| GFAFX | PNOCX | GFAFX / PNOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.62 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.62 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.862 | 7.607 | 261% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 6.6B | 5,168% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.02 | 1,256% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.72 | -4.73 | -311% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.01 | 32.39 | 235% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.28 | 0.79 | 5,335% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.23 | 38.01 | 277% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement