Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs PNOCX
GFAFX vs PNOCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PNOCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.78
Change+$0.76 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.08B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders C
Price$94.14
Change+$0.59 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.71B
GFAFX vs PNOCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PNOCX commentary
Nov 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and PNOCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 335B vs. PNOCX (6.71B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PNOCX: GFAFX (0.28) vs PNOCX (0.02). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PNOCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs PNOCX (26 years). PNOCX (1.62) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOCX (22.00). PNOCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: PNOCX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.02 vs. PNOCX (-5.36). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.41 vs. PNOCX (0.14).
| GFAFX | PNOCX | GFAFX / PNOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.62 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.62 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.008 | 10.506 | 181% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 335B | 6.71B | 4,995% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.02 | 1,265% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.02 | -5.36 | -150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.45 | 23.86 | 274% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.41 | 0.14 | 23,892% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.03 | 36.88 | 255% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement