Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs PNOCX
GFAFX vs PNOCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PNOCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$74.56
Change+$0.67 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Putnam Sustainable Leaders C
Price$86.00
Change+$0.82 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
GFAFX vs PNOCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PNOCX commentary
Dec 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and PNOCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 301B vs. PNOCX (6.58B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PNOCX: GFAFX (0.45) vs PNOCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PNOCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs PNOCX (25 years). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PNOCX (25.00). PNOCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: PNOCX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.89 vs. PNOCX (10.59). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.17 vs. PNOCX (13.89).
| GFAFX | PNOCX | GFAFX / PNOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.467 | 10.112 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 301B | 6.58B | 4,577% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.89 | 10.59 | 188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.26 | -6.55 | -65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.17 | 13.89 | 347% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.36 | 26.61 | 287% |