Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs PNOCX
GFAFX vs PNOCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PNOCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$76.03
Change-$1.83 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.33B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders C
Price$86.15
Change-$1.57 (-1.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.5B
GFAFX vs PNOCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PNOCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and PNOCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. PNOCX (6.5B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PNOCX: GFAFX (0.45) vs PNOCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PNOCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs PNOCX (26 years). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PNOCX (25.00). PNOCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: PNOCX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.28 vs. PNOCX (0.51). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.32 vs. PNOCX (8.51).
| GFAFX | PNOCX | GFAFX / PNOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.078 | 1.127 | 273% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304B | 6.5B | 4,679% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.28 | 0.51 | 2,395% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.02 | 5.39 | 427% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.32 | 8.51 | 497% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.87 | 22.12 | 329% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers