Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs PNOCX
GFAFX vs PNOCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PNOCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$62.58
Change+$0.17 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.76B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders C
Price$70.38
Change-$0.39 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.34B
GFAFX vs PNOCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PNOCX commentary
Apr 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and PNOCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 249B vs. PNOCX (5.34B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PNOCX: GFAFX (0.35) vs PNOCX (0.03). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PNOCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs PNOCX (26 years). PNOCX (1.62) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOCX (22.00). PNOCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: PNOCX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.80 vs. PNOCX (-18.25). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 52.16 vs. PNOCX (16.37).
| GFAFX | PNOCX | GFAFX / PNOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.62 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.62 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.388 | -16.927 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 249B | 5.34B | 4,662% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.03 | 1,371% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.80 | -18.25 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.53 | -16.44 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.16 | 16.37 | 319% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.64 | 1.15 | 3,701% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers