Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs PNOCX
GFAFX vs PNOCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PNOCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$78.20
Change+$0.52 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets312.2B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders C
Price$89.29
Change+$0.50 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.69B
GFAFX vs PNOCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PNOCX commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and PNOCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 312B vs. PNOCX (6.69B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PNOCX: GFAFX (0.45) vs PNOCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PNOCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs PNOCX (26 years). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PNOCX (25.00). PNOCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: PNOCX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.36 vs. PNOCX (10.65). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.68 vs. PNOCX (13.83).
| GFAFX | PNOCX | GFAFX / PNOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.315 | 4.226 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 312B | 6.69B | 4,662% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.36 | 10.65 | 210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.14 | 4.56 | 464% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.68 | 13.83 | 359% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.61 | 31.34 | 267% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...