Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs PNOYX
GFAFX vs PNOYX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PNOYX
GFAFX vs PNOYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PNOYX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and PNOYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. PNOYX (6.55B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PNOYX: GFAFX (0.20) vs PNOYX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PNOYX: GFAFX (26 years) vs PNOYX (32 years). GFAFX (0.65) and PNOYX (0.63) have similar cost to investors . PNOYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). PNOYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: PNOYX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.02 vs. PNOYX (-0.03). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.04 vs. PNOYX (1.06).
| GFAFX | PNOYX | GFAFX / PNOYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.63 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.63 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.043 | 4.566 | 198% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 6.55B | 5,387% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.02 | -0.03 | -90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.74 | 29.62 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.04 | 1.06 | 1,225% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.25 | 102.81 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement