Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs PRGFX
GFAFX vs PRGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PRGFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$66.25
Change-$3.95 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock
Price$91.44
Change-$5.37 (-5.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.62B
GFAFX vs PRGFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PRGFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and PRGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. PRGFX (45.6B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PRGFX: GFAFX (0.35) vs PRGFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PRGFX: GFAFX (24 years) vs PRGFX (75 years). GFAFX (0.67) and PRGFX (0.65) have similar cost to investors . PRGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.20 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGFX: GFAFX (250) vs PRGFX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.16 vs. PRGFX (-0.10). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 71.15 vs. PRGFX (63.81).
| GFAFX | PRGFX | GFAFX / PRGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 75 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.826 | -8.202 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 45.6B | 614% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.16 | -0.10 | -158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.18 | 4.63 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.15 | 63.81 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.48 | 76.05 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...