Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs PRGFX
GFAFX vs PRGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PRGFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.53
Change+$0.06 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock
Price$119.43
Change-$0.08 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.72B
GFAFX vs PRGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PRGFX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and PRGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. PRGFX (51.7B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PRGFX: GFAFX (0.29) vs PRGFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PRGFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs PRGFX (75 years). GFAFX (0.67) and PRGFX (0.65) have similar cost to investors . PRGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.20 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGFX: GFAFX (250) vs PRGFX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.53 vs. PRGFX (15.17). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.46 vs. PRGFX (36.90).
| GFAFX | PRGFX | GFAFX / PRGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 75 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.669 | 13.323 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 51.7B | 658% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.53 | 15.17 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.27 | 69.13 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.46 | 36.90 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.79 | 115.34 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement