Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs PRGFX
GFAFX vs PRGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PRGFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$83.19
Change+$0.26 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.99B
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock
Price$115.73
Change+$1.02 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.03B
GFAFX vs PRGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PRGFX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and PRGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. PRGFX (51B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PRGFX: GFAFX (0.30) vs PRGFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PRGFX: GFAFX (24 years) vs PRGFX (75 years). GFAFX (0.67) and PRGFX (0.65) have similar cost to investors . PRGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.20 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGFX: GFAFX (250) vs PRGFX (2500). GFAFX (18.48) and PRGFX (17.62) have marching annual gain over last year. GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.86 vs. PRGFX (32.54).
| GFAFX | PRGFX | GFAFX / PRGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 75 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.785 | 9.738 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325B | 51B | 637% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.48 | 17.62 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.32 | 50.87 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.86 | 32.54 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.51 | 100.72 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement