Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs PRGFX
GFAFX vs PRGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PRGFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$76.26
Change+$0.87 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.54B
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock
Price$106.45
Change+$1.07 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.64B
GFAFX vs PRGFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PRGFX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and PRGFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 307B vs. PRGFX (51.6B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PRGFX: GFAFX (0.45) vs PRGFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PRGFX: GFAFX (24 years) vs PRGFX (75 years). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PRGFX (28.90). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGFX: GFAFX (250) vs PRGFX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.21 vs. PRGFX (21.01). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.81 vs. PRGFX (37.55).
| GFAFX | PRGFX | GFAFX / PRGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 75 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.389 | 0.939 | 361% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 307B | 51.6B | 595% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.21 | 21.01 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.67 | 11.76 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.81 | 37.55 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.01 | 109.54 | 77% |