Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs PRGFX
GFAFX vs PRGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PRGFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$82.07
Change-$0.34 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.19B
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock
Price$112.26
Change+$0.53 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.98B
GFAFX vs PRGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PRGFX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and PRGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 324B vs. PRGFX (50B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PRGFX: GFAFX (0.30) vs PRGFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PRGFX: GFAFX (24 years) vs PRGFX (75 years). GFAFX (0.67) and PRGFX (0.65) have similar cost to investors . PRGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.20 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGFX: GFAFX (250) vs PRGFX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.53 vs. PRGFX (3.95). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.06 vs. PRGFX (34.29).
| GFAFX | PRGFX | GFAFX / PRGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 75 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.266 | 5.945 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 324B | 50B | 648% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.53 | 3.95 | 241% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.26 | 60.07 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.06 | 34.29 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.65 | 91.31 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement