Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs PRGFX
GFAFX vs PRGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PRGFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.75
Change-$0.57 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock
Price$121.37
Change-$0.53 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.1B
GFAFX vs PRGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PRGFX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and PRGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. PRGFX (52.1B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PRGFX: GFAFX (0.29) vs PRGFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PRGFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs PRGFX (76 years). GFAFX (0.67) and PRGFX (0.65) have similar cost to investors . PRGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.20 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGFX: GFAFX (250) vs PRGFX (2500). PRGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.46 vs. GFAFX (15.06). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.85 vs. PRGFX (32.85).
| GFAFX | PRGFX | GFAFX / PRGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 76 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.967 | 15.589 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 52.1B | 658% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.06 | 16.46 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.70 | 84.64 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.85 | 32.85 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.69 | 121.04 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement