Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs PRGFX
GFAFX vs PRGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PRGFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.33
Change+$0.55 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.05B
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock
Price$123.13
Change+$0.54 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.35B
GFAFX vs PRGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PRGFX commentary
Nov 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and PRGFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. PRGFX (51.3B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PRGFX: GFAFX (0.28) vs PRGFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PRGFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs PRGFX (76 years). GFAFX (0.67) and PRGFX (0.65) have similar cost to investors . PRGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.20 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGFX: GFAFX (250) vs PRGFX (2500). PRGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.25 vs. GFAFX (9.20). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.24 vs. PRGFX (27.21).
| GFAFX | PRGFX | GFAFX / PRGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 76 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.753 | 16.755 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 51.3B | 663% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.20 | 10.25 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.08 | 84.60 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.24 | 27.21 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.09 | 110.86 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers