Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs PRGFX
GFAFX vs PRGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PRGFX
GFAFX vs PRGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PRGFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and PRGFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. PRGFX (50.4B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PRGFX: GFAFX (0.20) vs PRGFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PRGFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs PRGFX (76 years). PRGFX (0.66) and GFAFX (0.65) have similar cost to investors . PRGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.20 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGFX: GFAFX (250) vs PRGFX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.03 vs. PRGFX (5.67). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.91 vs. PRGFX (0.22).
| GFAFX | PRGFX | GFAFX / PRGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.66 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.66 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 76 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.691 | 3.524 | 247% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 50.4B | 716% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.03 | 5.67 | 212% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.36 | 39.65 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.91 | 0.22 | 8,752% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.77 | 126.97 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers