Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs PRGFX
GFAFX vs PRGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PRGFX
GFAFX vs PRGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PRGFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and PRGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. PRGFX (48.7B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PRGFX: GFAFX (0.20) vs PRGFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PRGFX: GFAFX (26 years) vs PRGFX (76 years). PRGFX (0.66) and GFAFX (0.65) have similar cost to investors . PRGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.20 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGFX: GFAFX (250) vs PRGFX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.02 vs. PRGFX (-7.54). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.04 vs. PRGFX (-6.44).
| GFAFX | PRGFX | GFAFX / PRGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.66 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.66 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 76 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.043 | 1.516 | 597% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 48.7B | 725% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.02 | -7.54 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.74 | 30.99 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.04 | -6.44 | -202% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.25 | 107.62 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers