Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs PRGFX
GFAFX vs PRGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PRGFX
GFAFX vs PRGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PRGFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and PRGFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. PRGFX (50.2B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PRGFX: GFAFX (0.20) vs PRGFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PRGFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs PRGFX (76 years). PRGFX (0.66) and GFAFX (0.65) have similar cost to investors . PRGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.20 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGFX: GFAFX (250) vs PRGFX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. PRGFX (0.01). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.72 vs. PRGFX (-2.24).
| GFAFX | PRGFX | GFAFX / PRGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.66 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.66 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 76 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.134 | 3.710 | 192% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 50.2B | 711% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | 0.01 | 47,425% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.15 | 33.36 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.72 | -2.24 | -701% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.45 | 114.54 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement