Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs RRGSX
GFAFX vs RRGSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs RRGSX
GFAFX vs RRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. RRGSX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and RRGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. RRGSX (48.8B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than RRGSX: GFAFX (0.20) vs RRGSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than RRGSX: GFAFX (25 years) vs RRGSX (24 years). RRGSX (1.17) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). RRGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.20 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRGSX: GFAFX (250) vs RRGSX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.42 vs. RRGSX (-6.74). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.09 vs. RRGSX (-12.68).
| GFAFX | RRGSX | GFAFX / RRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.17 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.17 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.299 | 1.158 | 890% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 342B | 48.8B | 701% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.42 | -6.74 | -66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.54 | 24.33 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.09 | -12.68 | -103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.35 | 87.53 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers