Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs RRGSX
GFAFX vs RRGSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs RRGSX
GFAFX vs RRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. RRGSX commentary
Jun 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and RRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. RRGSX (48.3B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than RRGSX: GFAFX (0.20) vs RRGSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than RRGSX: GFAFX (25 years) vs RRGSX (24 years). RRGSX (1.17) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). RRGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.20 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRGSX: GFAFX (250) vs RRGSX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.03 vs. RRGSX (-4.32). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.74 vs. RRGSX (-9.23).
| GFAFX | RRGSX | GFAFX / RRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.17 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.17 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.745 | -0.642 | -1,051% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 48.3B | 747% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.03 | -4.32 | -140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.43 | 28.80 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.74 | -9.23 | -171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.30 | 100.85 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers