Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs RRGSX
GFAFX vs RRGSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs RRGSX
GFAFX vs RRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. RRGSX commentary
Jun 08, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and RRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. RRGSX (49.8B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than RRGSX: GFAFX (0.20) vs RRGSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than RRGSX: GFAFX (25 years) vs RRGSX (24 years). RRGSX (1.17) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). RRGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.20 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRGSX: GFAFX (250) vs RRGSX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.94 vs. RRGSX (1.18). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.71 vs. RRGSX (-0.79).
| GFAFX | RRGSX | GFAFX / RRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.17 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.17 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.187 | 1.936 | 268% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 49.8B | 725% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.94 | 1.18 | 757% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.82 | 33.69 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.71 | -0.79 | -2,246% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.18 | 94.64 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers