Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs RRGSX
GFAFX vs RRGSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs RRGSX
GFAFX vs RRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. RRGSX commentary
Aug 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and RRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. RRGSX (50.5B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than RRGSX: GFAFX (0.21) vs RRGSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than RRGSX: GFAFX (25 years) vs RRGSX (24 years). RRGSX (1.17) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). RRGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.20 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRGSX: GFAFX (250) vs RRGSX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.59 vs. RRGSX (-4.94). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 16.86 vs. RRGSX (-6.86).
| GFAFX | RRGSX | GFAFX / RRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.17 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.17 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.085 | 4.104 | 246% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 50.5B | 707% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.59 | -4.94 | -113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.45 | 32.56 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.86 | -6.86 | -246% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.39 | 92.25 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers