Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs RYGRX
GFAFX vs RYGRX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs RYGRX
GFAFX vs RYGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. RYGRX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and RYGRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. RYGRX (49.8M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than RYGRX: GFAFX (0.20) vs RYGRX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than RYGRX: GFAFX (25 years) vs RYGRX (22 years). RYGRX (2.34) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). RYGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1148.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYGRX: GFAFX (250) vs RYGRX (2500). RYGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.35 vs. GFAFX (14.87). RYGRX return over 5 years is better than : 55.17 vs. GFAFX (24.95).
| GFAFX | RYGRX | GFAFX / RYGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.29 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.34 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.425 | 28.961 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 49.8M | 678,715% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.87 | 31.35 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.27 | 87.17 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.95 | 55.17 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.87 | 135.84 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement