Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs SCQGX
GFAFX vs SCQGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs SCQGX
GFAFX vs SCQGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. SCQGX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and SCQGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. SCQGX (391M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than SCQGX: GFAFX (0.20) vs SCQGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than SCQGX: GFAFX (26 years) vs SCQGX (35 years). SCQGX (0.87) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SCQGX (15.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCQGX: GFAFX (250) vs SCQGX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.18 vs. SCQGX (-7.86). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 11.69 vs. SCQGX (5.51).
| GFAFX | SCQGX | GFAFX / SCQGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.80 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.87 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.327 | 4.894 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 391M | 90,281% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.18 | -7.86 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.77 | 37.43 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.69 | 5.51 | 212% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.04 | 134.26 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement